Complete Health Indicator Report of HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) Measures: Diabetes Care - Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
Definition
Percentage of health plan members with diabetes who had their Hemoglobin A1c tested within the last year.Numerator
Number of sampled health plan members with diabetes who had their Hemoglobin A1c tested within the last year.Denominator
Number of sampled health plan members with diabetes.Data Interpretation Issues
Evidence from health plan administrative records and survey interviews indicates that the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) surveys might substantially underestimate the proportion of persons with diabetes who have a routine A1C test. Note that starting in 2017, Utah commercial HMOs and PPOs are now regarded as functionally the same and are used together in calculating the state averages.Why Is This Important?
The Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) test measures the level of blood glucose for persons with diabetes. High levels of blood glucose puts people at risk for blindness, kidney disease, and lower extremity infections. With support from their provider, people can can reduce their risk of serious complications by controlling their levels of blood glucose.Healthy People Objective: Increase the proportion of adults with diabetes who have a glycosylated hemoglobin measurement at least twice a year
U.S. Target: 71.1 percentHow Are We Doing?
The American Diabetes Association recommends an A1C exam about every three months.What Is Being Done?
The Diabetes Prevention and Control Program has been combined with the Heart Disease and Stroke Program, the Physical Activity, Nutrition and Obesity Program, and a School Health Program. The new program is known as the Healthy Living through Environment, Policy, and Improved Clinical Care (EPICC) Program. One of EPICC's main goals is to decrease the proportion of people with diabetes who have A1Cs greater than 9%. A number of studies show that people who attend diabetes self-management education classes have lower A1C levels. These classes are usually taught by a dietitian, pharmacist, or certified diabetes educator, and have been shown to help individuals develop a variety of skills, including blood sugar monitoring, they need to manage their diabetes. A list of classes is available at [https://livingwell.utah.gov/program.php?grp=diab].Available Services
Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) [https://livingwell.utah.gov/program.php?grp=diab]Related Indicators
Related Relevant Population Characteristics Indicators:
Graphical Data Views
Percentage of Persons With Diabetes Who Had Their Hemoglobin A1c Tested Within the Last Year, Utah, 2000-2020
This Indicator Report contains information about Medicaid Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), commercial HMOs, and commercial Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs). 2013 was the first year that PPOs were been included in this report and represents a significant expansion of the report's scope. With the inclusion of PPOs to the other plans, over 50% of Utahns who currently have health insurance are covered by one of the health plans in this report.
Medicaid vs. Commercial Plans | Year | Percentage of Persons With Diabetes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 74 | ||||||
Medicaid | 2000 | 77.3% | ||||
Medicaid | 2001 | 78.8% | ||||
Medicaid | 2002 | 73.3% | ||||
Medicaid | 2003 | 78.6% | ||||
Medicaid | 2004 | 82.7% | ||||
Medicaid | 2005 | 79.8% | ||||
Medicaid | 2006 | 78.9% | ||||
Medicaid | 2007 | 81.4% | ||||
Medicaid | 2008 | 82.0% | ||||
Medicaid | 2009 | 83.8% | ||||
Medicaid | 2010 | 86.6% | ||||
Medicaid | 2011 | 87.1% | ||||
Medicaid | 2012 | 86.4% | ||||
Medicaid | 2013 | 86.4% | ||||
Medicaid | 2014 | 86.7% | ||||
Medicaid | 2015 | 87.5% | ||||
Medicaid | 2016 | 85.1% | ||||
Medicaid | 2017 | 88.5% | ||||
Medicaid | 2018 | 86.8% | ||||
Medicaid | 2019 | 89.3% | ||||
Medicaid | 2020 | 85.3% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2000 | 67.5% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2001 | 74.2% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2002 | 76.3% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2003 | 83.3% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2004 | 82.4% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2005 | 86.5% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2006 | 85.5% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2007 | 87.7% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2008 | 88.5% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2009 | 89.2% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2010 | 82.4% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2011 | 90.4% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2012 | 88.9% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2013 | 91.2% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2014 | 91.6% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2015 | 94.1% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2016 | 92.4% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2017 | 90.1% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2018 | 90.3% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2019 | 90.3% | ||||
Commercial HMOs | 2020 | 87.9% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2013 | 84.3% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2014 | 88.0% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2015 | 89.1% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2016 | 89.3% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2017 | 90.1% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2018 | 90.3% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2019 | 90.3% | ||||
Commercial PPOs | 2020 | 87.5% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2009 | 80.5% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2010 | 80.6% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2011 | 82.0% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2012 | 82.5% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2013 | 83.0% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2014 | 86.3% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2015 | 85.6% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2016 | 86.7% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2017 | 87.5% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2018 | 88.0% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2019 | 88.2% | ||||
U.S. Medicaid Average | 2020 | 82.8% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2009 | 89.1% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2010 | 89.0% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2011 | 89.9% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2012 | 89.6% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2013 | 89.8% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2014 | 90.3% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2015 | 89.5% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2016 | 90.1% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2017 | 90.6% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2018 | 91.0% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2019 | 91.0% | ||||
U.S. Commercial Average | 2020 | 87.6% |
Data Notes
This quality of care measure Indicator Report came from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), which is developed and maintained by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). The HEDIS measurement set contains over 70 measures across eight major areas of care such as helping people stay healthy or caring for people with chronic illness. Health plans nationwide collect these measures to see how they performed in different areas of health care over the past year. Each year, Utah HMOs report HEDIS measures to the Utah Department of Health. All data are reviewed by NCQA-certified auditors to ensure that the reported HEDIS measures are representative and accurate. The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) is a non-profit organization committed to assessing, reporting on, and improving the quality of care provided by the nation's health plans.Data Source
Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), National Center for Quality Assurance (NCQA)References and Community Resources
Healthy Living through Environment, Policy & Improved Clinical Care (EPICC Program), Information on Diabetes [https://livingwell.utah.gov/program.php?grp=diab] [[br]][[br]] Utah Department of Health, Office of Health Care Statistics [https://stats.health.utah.gov/about-the-data/health-plan-quality/]More Resources and Links
Evidence-based community health improvement ideas and interventions may be found at the following sites:Additional indicator data by state and county may be found on these Websites:
- CDC Prevention Status Reports for all 50 states
- County Health Rankings
- Kaiser Family Foundation's StateHealthFacts.org
- CDC WONDER DATA2010, the Healthy People 2010 Database.
Medical literature can be queried at the PubMed website.
Page Content Updated On 11/03/2021,
Published on 01/14/2022