Complete Health Indicator Report of Fair/poor health
Definition
Percentage of adults aged 18 years and older who reported fair or poor general health.Numerator
Number of survey respondents who reported fair or poor general health.Denominator
Total number of survey respondents except those with missing, "Don't know/Not sure," and "Refused" responses.Data Interpretation Issues
Question Text: "Would you say that in general your health is excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?" Beginning in 2011, BRFSS data include both landline and cell phone respondent data along with a new weighting methodology called iterative proportional fitting, or raking. This methodology utilizes additional demographic information (such as education, race, and marital status) in the weighting procedure. Both of these methodology changes were implemented to account for an increased number of U.S. households without landline phones and an under-representation of certain demographic groups that were not well-represented in the sample. More details about these changes can be found at: [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/pdf/opha/resource/brfss/RakingImpact2011.pdf]. As with all surveys, some error results from nonresponse (e.g., refusal to participate in the survey or to answer specific questions), and measurement (e.g., social desirability or recall bias). Error was minimized by use of strict calling protocols, good questionnaire design, standardization of interviewer behavior, interviewer training, and frequent, on-site interviewer monitoring and supervision.Why Is This Important?
Self-rated health (SRH) has been collected for many years on National Center for Health Statistics surveys and since 1993 on the state-based BRFSS. SRH is an independent predictor of important health outcomes including mortality, morbidity, and functional status. It is considered to be a reliable indicator of a person's perceived health and is a good global assessment of a person's well being.Other Objectives
Fair/poor health is one of the population outcome indicators tracked by the Utah Department of Health and Human Services to measure success in ensuring its objective that "All Utahns have fair and equitable opportunities to be healthy and safe." [https://dhhs.utah.gov/dhhs-performance-measures-hub/dhhs-scorecard/]How Are We Doing?
In 2023, approximately 14.5% (age-adjusted rate) of Utah adults aged 18 and older reported fair or poor general health status. In the same time period, 85.5% of Utah adults reported good, very good, or excellent general health status.How Do We Compare With the U.S.?
Between the years 1993-2023, the proportion of adults who reported good or better health was significantly higher in Utah than for the U.S. as a whole (age-adjusted rates). These age-adjusted rates in 2023 were 85.5% in Utah compared to 81.4% in the U.S.What Is Being Done?
The Utah Department of Health and Human Services, through many programs, works to prevent avoidable illness, injury, disability, and premature death; assure access to affordable, quality healthcare; and to promote healthy lifestyles.Available Services
Utah Health Information Phone Numbers: Check Your Health: 1-888-222-2542 [[br]] Utah Tobacco Quit Line: 1-888-567-TRUTH (8788)[[br]] Utah Cancer Control Resource Line: 1-800-717-1811 [[br]] Utah Medicaid Program Information 1-800-662-9651Related Indicators
Relevant Population Characteristics
Since middle-age adults and older adults are at a greater risk of most chronic conditions, they are more likely to report fair or poor health. Adults with lower incomes and educational attainment are also more likely to report that their health is fair or poor.Related Relevant Population Characteristics Indicators:
Health Care System Factors
Having health insurance can guarantee access to health care which has an effect on people's health status.Related Health Care System Factors Indicators:
Risk Factors
Persons with unhealthy behaviors such as sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, and poor dietary habits are at increased risk of poor health status.Related Risk Factors Indicators:
Health Status Outcomes
Poor health can increase the risk of limitations of activity.Related Health Status Outcomes Indicators:
Graphical Data Views
Age group | Percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 5 | ||||||
18-34 | 11.3% | 9.8% | 13.1% | |||
35-49 | 12.5% | 11.1% | 14.1% | |||
50-64 | 17.3% | 15.3% | 19.4% | |||
65+ | 20.4% | 18.5% | 22.4% |
Data Source
Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]Income category | Age-adjusted percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 5 | ||||||
<$25,000 | 35.5% | 31.1% | 40.0% | |||
$25,000-$49,999 | 23.5% | 20.8% | 26.4% | |||
$50,000-$74,999 | 13.6% | 11.6% | 16.1% | |||
$75,000+ | 8.5% | 7.4% | 9.7% | |||
Total | 14.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% |
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]Education level | Age-adjusted percentage of adults 25+ | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 5 | ||||||
Less than high school | 34.9% | 29.8% | 40.5% | |||
H.S. grad or G.E.D. | 19.3% | 17.3% | 21.5% | |||
Some post high school | 14.1% | 12.5% | 15.8% | |||
College graduate | 8.7% | 7.8% | 9.8% | |||
Total | 14.9% | 14.0% | 15.9% |
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population.Data Source
Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]Hispanic ethnicity | Age-adjusted percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 4 | ||||||
Hispanic/Latino | 23.6% | 20.7% | 26.7% | |||
Non-Hispanic/Latino | 13.0% | 12.1% | 13.9% | |||
All ethnicities | 14.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% | |||
U.S. | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population.Data Sources
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Race | Age-adjusted percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 9 | ||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native | 26.3% | 21.3% | 32.1% | |||
Asian | 7.1% | 4.9% | 10.4% | |||
Black, African American | 19.8% | 14.9% | 25.9% | |||
Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander | 15.6% | 9.9% | 23.7% | |||
White | 12.6% | 12.1% | 13.1% | |||
Other | 16.7% | 12.9% | 21.3% | |||
Two or more races | 19.4% | 14.5% | 25.4% | |||
All races | 13.8% | 13.3% | 14.3% | |||
U.S. | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Data Notes
Please note that in 2023 the question for race changed. These categories represent respondents reporting a single race alone. If multiple races were given, responses are in the "Two or more races" category. Age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population based on 3 age groups: 18-34, 35-49, and 50+.Data Sources
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Local health district | Age-adjusted percentage of persons | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Note | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 15 | ||||||
Bear River | 12.5% | 9.6% | 16.1% | |||
Central | 14.6% | 11.0% | 19.1% | |||
Davis County | 15.5% | 12.5% | 19.0% | |||
Salt Lake County | 14.6% | 13.1% | 16.2% | |||
San Juan | 20.4% | 12.9% | 30.9% | |||
Southeast | 16.6% | 12.3% | 22.0% | |||
Southwest | 14.8% | 12.1% | 17.9% | |||
Summit | 7.8% | 4.8% | 12.3% | |||
Tooele | 18.8% | 14.5% | 23.9% | |||
TriCounty | 19.2% | 14.7% | 24.7% | |||
Utah County | 12.3% | 10.5% | 14.4% | |||
Wasatch | 10.8% | 6.1% | 18.4% | * | ||
Weber-Morgan | 15.2% | 12.5% | 18.3% | |||
State of Utah | 14.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% | |||
U.S. | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Data Notes
*Use caution in interpreting; the estimate has a coefficient of variation >30% and is therefore deemed unreliable by Utah Department of Health and Human Services standards. Age-adjusted to the U.S. 2000 standard population. Note: At the time of this update, the BRFSS U.S. dataset did not include an age variable but did include five age categories up to age 80+ (vs. the typical weighting scheme that includes 85+). Comparisons with both weighting schemes were compared using Utah data, and the difference was about 1/100 of a percentage point.Data Sources
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Utah Small Areas | Age-adjusted percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Note | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 101 | ||||||
Brigham City | 15.1% | 9.8% | 22.5% | |||
Box Elder Co (Other) V2 | 9.3% | 5.5% | 15.4% | |||
Tremonton | 9.1% | 5.0% | 15.9% | * | ||
Logan V2 | 11.9% | 8.9% | 15.6% | |||
North Logan | 15.8% | 10.2% | 23.5% | |||
Cache (Other)/Rich (All) V2 | 12.0% | 7.5% | 18.7% | |||
Hyrum | 17.4% | 10.3% | 27.7% | |||
Smithfield | 10.2% | 4.2% | 22.5% | * | ||
Ben Lomond | 17.4% | 13.9% | 21.6% | |||
Weber County (East) | 10.4% | 7.3% | 14.4% | |||
Morgan County | 14.0% | 7.5% | 24.7% | * | ||
Ogden (Downtown) | 19.1% | 14.8% | 24.3% | |||
South Ogden | 13.5% | 9.9% | 18.0% | |||
Roy/Hooper | 17.4% | 13.3% | 22.4% | |||
Riverdale | 18.2% | 12.6% | 25.5% | |||
Clearfield Area/Hooper | 16.7% | 13.0% | 21.1% | |||
Layton/South Weber | 18.0% | 14.2% | 22.6% | |||
Kaysville/Fruit Heights | 8.7% | 5.3% | 13.7% | |||
Syracuse | 12.6% | 7.8% | 19.5% | |||
Centerville | 6.9% | 3.1% | 14.8% | * | ||
Farmington | ** | ** | ||||
North Salt Lake | 18.5% | 12.4% | 26.8% | |||
Woods Cross/West Bountiful | 14.9% | 8.4% | 25.0% | |||
Bountiful | 12.0% | 8.7% | 16.4% | |||
SLC (Rose Park) | 31.0% | 24.6% | 38.1% | |||
SLC (Avenues) | 2.9% | 1.5% | 5.8% | * | ||
SLC (Foothill/East Bench) | 4.0% | 1.5% | 10.4% | * | ||
Magna | 21.4% | 16.4% | 27.5% | |||
SLC (Glendale) V2 | 24.2% | 16.3% | 34.4% | |||
West Valley (Center) | 21.9% | 17.0% | 27.6% | |||
West Valley (West) V2 | 19.9% | 14.1% | 27.2% | |||
West Valley (East) V2 | 24.8% | 19.7% | 30.7% | |||
SLC (Downtown) V2 | 15.4% | 11.1% | 21.0% | |||
SLC (Southeast Liberty) | 12.5% | 7.1% | 20.9% | * | ||
South Salt Lake | 21.0% | 15.1% | 28.6% | |||
SLC (Sugar House) | 10.8% | 7.2% | 15.7% | |||
Millcreek (South) | 8.5% | 4.2% | 16.4% | * | ||
Millcreek (East) | 12.9% | 7.4% | 21.4% | * | ||
Holladay V2 | 11.1% | 6.7% | 17.8% | |||
Cottonwood | 6.7% | 4.1% | 10.7% | |||
Kearns V2 | 21.3% | 15.7% | 28.3% | |||
Taylorsville (E)/Murray (W) | 10.7% | 7.6% | 15.0% | |||
Taylorsville (West) | 14.2% | 10.3% | 19.2% | |||
Murray | 14.6% | 10.3% | 20.2% | |||
Midvale | 17.4% | 12.8% | 23.3% | |||
West Jordan (Northeast) V2 | 13.6% | 8.8% | 20.2% | |||
West Jordan (Southeast) | 14.7% | 10.5% | 20.3% | |||
West Jordan (W)/Copperton | 11.5% | 7.8% | 16.8% | |||
South Jordan V2 | 12.0% | 8.4% | 17.0% | |||
Daybreak | 8.0% | 4.9% | 12.8% | |||
Sandy (West) | 18.0% | 12.7% | 24.8% | |||
Sandy (Center) V2 | 6.9% | 4.4% | 10.8% | |||
Sandy (Northeast) | 6.5% | 3.3% | 12.6% | * | ||
Sandy (Southeast) | 11.8% | 7.2% | 18.8% | |||
Draper | 9.4% | 6.3% | 13.9% | |||
Riverton/Bluffdale | 9.1% | 6.2% | 13.0% | |||
Herriman | 7.0% | 4.4% | 10.9% | |||
Tooele County (Other) | 12.4% | 9.0% | 16.9% | |||
Tooele Valley | 16.6% | 13.6% | 20.1% | |||
Eagle Mountain/Cedar Valley | 16.6% | 11.7% | 22.9% | |||
Lehi | 10.8% | 7.9% | 14.6% | |||
Saratoga Springs | 6.4% | 3.2% | 12.4% | |||
American Fork | 8.9% | 6.0% | 13.0% | |||
Alpine | ** | ** | ||||
Pleasant Grove/Lindon | 8.8% | 6.5% | 12.0% | |||
Orem (North) | 12.1% | 8.6% | 16.6% | |||
Orem (West) | 14.6% | 10.7% | 19.7% | |||
Orem (East) | 9.2% | 5.4% | 15.4% | |||
Provo/BYU | 10.3% | 7.1% | 14.7% | |||
Provo (West City Center) | 18.6% | 13.6% | 24.7% | |||
Provo (East City Center) | 11.8% | 6.5% | 20.5% | |||
Salem City | 8.2% | 4.1% | 15.7% | * | ||
Spanish Fork | 13.7% | 10.0% | 18.6% | |||
Springville | 13.0% | 9.3% | 17.8% | |||
Mapleton | 2.9% | 1.2% | 6.9% | * | ||
Utah County (South) V2 | 12.6% | 7.5% | 20.4% | |||
Payson | 12.7% | 7.6% | 20.4% | |||
Park City | 5.7% | 3.6% | 8.7% | |||
Summit County (East) | 10.6% | 6.4% | 17.2% | |||
Wasatch County | 9.7% | 6.6% | 14.0% | |||
Daggett and Uintah County | 15.6% | 12.7% | 18.9% | |||
Duchesne County | 16.5% | 12.7% | 21.2% | |||
Nephi/Mona | 15.7% | 9.8% | 24.0% | |||
Delta/Fillmore | 18.4% | 12.1% | 27.1% | |||
Sanpete Valley | 13.8% | 9.5% | 19.8% | |||
Central (Other) | 13.6% | 9.6% | 18.8% | |||
Richfield/Monroe/Salina | 13.6% | 9.7% | 18.7% | |||
Carbon County | 17.2% | 13.7% | 21.4% | |||
Emery County | 15.0% | 10.5% | 21.1% | |||
Grand County | 16.8% | 11.7% | 23.5% | |||
Blanding/Monticello | 11.8% | 7.4% | 18.4% | |||
San Juan County (Other) | 35.8% | 25.0% | 48.4% | |||
St. George | 13.5% | 11.0% | 16.5% | |||
Washington Co (Other) V2 | 8.0% | 3.6% | 17.0% | * | ||
Washington City | 10.4% | 6.6% | 16.1% | |||
Hurricane/La Verkin | 20.1% | 14.7% | 26.8% | |||
Ivins/Santa Clara | 9.9% | 4.6% | 20.3% | |||
Cedar City | 18.2% | 13.6% | 23.8% | |||
Southwest LHD (Other) | 13.0% | 9.1% | 18.3% | |||
State of Utah | 13.8% | 13.3% | 14.3% | |||
U.S. | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 standard population. *Use caution in interpreting; the estimate has a coefficient of variation > 30% and is therefore deemed unreliable by Utah Department of Health and Human Services standards. **Estimates have been suppressed because the relative standard of error is greater than 50%. A description of the Utah Small Areas may be found on IBIS at the following URL: [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/resource/Guidelines.html].Data Sources
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
BRFSS Utah vs. U.S. | Year | Age-adjusted percentage of adults | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Record Count: 64 | ||||||
UT Old Methodology | 1993 | 12.6% | 10.9% | 14.4% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1994 | 12.2% | 10.5% | 13.9% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1995 | 13.2% | 11.6% | 14.9% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1996 | 12.2% | 10.7% | 13.7% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1997 | 11.9% | 10.3% | 13.5% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1998 | 11.6% | 10.1% | 13.0% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 1999 | 11.0% | 9.6% | 12.4% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2000 | 12.3% | 10.7% | 13.8% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2001 | 10.8% | 9.5% | 12.0% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2002 | 11.9% | 10.7% | 13.2% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2003 | 12.3% | 10.9% | 13.6% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2004 | 13.7% | 12.6% | 14.8% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2005 | 14.5% | 13.3% | 15.7% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2006 | 14.2% | 13.0% | 15.4% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2007 | 11.9% | 10.9% | 13.0% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2008 | 11.7% | 10.7% | 12.7% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2009 | 11.6% | 10.9% | 12.4% | ||
UT Old Methodology | 2010 | 12.5% | 11.7% | 13.4% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1993 | 13.9% | 13.6% | 14.2% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1994 | 14.2% | 13.9% | 14.6% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1995 | 14.2% | 13.9% | 14.6% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1996 | 14.4% | 14.1% | 14.7% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1997 | 14.3% | 14.0% | 14.6% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1998 | 14.7% | 14.4% | 15.0% | ||
US Old Methodology | 1999 | 14.6% | 14.3% | 14.9% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2000 | 15.3% | 15.0% | 15.6% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2001 | 15.5% | 15.2% | 15.7% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2002 | 15.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2003 | 15.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2004 | 16.2% | 15.9% | 16.5% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2005 | 16.3% | 16.1% | 16.6% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2006 | 16.0% | 15.8% | 16.3% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2007 | 16.2% | 16.0% | 16.5% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2008 | 15.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2009 | 15.5% | 15.3% | 15.8% | ||
US Old Methodology | 2010 | 15.5% | 15.3% | 15.7% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2009 | 13.2% | 12.3% | 14.0% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2010 | 14.0% | 13.2% | 14.8% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2011 | 14.3% | 13.5% | 15.1% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2012 | 13.7% | 12.9% | 14.5% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2013 | 13.1% | 12.4% | 13.9% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2014 | 12.7% | 12.1% | 13.4% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2015 | 12.9% | 12.2% | 13.7% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2016 | 12.2% | 11.4% | 13.0% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2017 | 13.9% | 13.1% | 14.8% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2018 | 14.9% | 14.1% | 15.8% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2019 | 14.7% | 13.9% | 15.6% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2020 | 11.0% | 10.3% | 11.8% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2021 | 12.7% | 11.9% | 13.6% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2022 | 14.2% | 13.3% | 15.2% | ||
UT New Methodology | 2023 | 14.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% | ||
US New Methodology | 2011 | 17.5% | 17.2% | 17.7% | ||
US New Methodology | 2012 | 17.4% | 17.2% | 17.6% | ||
US New Methodology | 2013 | 17.4% | 17.2% | 17.6% | ||
US New Methodology | 2014 | 17.3% | 17.0% | 17.5% | ||
US New Methodology | 2015 | 16.9% | 16.2% | 17.5% | ||
US New Methodology | 2016 | 17.2% | 17.0% | 17.5% | ||
US New Methodology | 2017 | 17.9% | 17.7% | 18.2% | ||
US New Methodology | 2018 | 17.8% | 17.5% | 18.0% | ||
US New Methodology | 2019 | 18.0% | 17.8% | 18.3% | ||
US New Methodology | 2020 | 13.9% | 13.6% | 14.1% | ||
US New Methodology | 2021 | 16.1% | 15.9% | 16.4% | ||
US New Methodology | 2022 | 17.3% | 17.0% | 17.5% | ||
US New Methodology | 2023 | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Data Notes
Age-adjusted to U.S. 2000 population. U.S. data are the average of all states and the District of Columbia; they do not include U.S. territories. Starting in 2009, the BRFSS included both landline and cell phone respondent interviews along with a new weighting methodology called iterative proportional fitting, or raking. More details about these changes can be found at: [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/pdf/opha/resource/brfss/RakingImpact2011.pdf]. Note: At the time of this update, the BRFSS U.S. dataset did not include an age variable but did include five age categories up to age 80+ (vs. the typical weighting scheme that includes 85+). Comparisons with both weighting schemes were compared using Utah data, and the difference was about 1/100 of a percentage point.Data Sources
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [https://ibis.utah.gov/ibisph-view/query/selection/brfss/BRFSSSelection.html]
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
References and community resources
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - [http://www.cdc.gov/] Utah Healthy Environments Active Living (HEAL) Program [[br]] [https://heal.utah.gov/][[br]] [[br]] Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System - [http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/]More Resources and Links
Additional indicator data by state and county may be found on these websites:- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database, a system for disseminating public health data and information.
- United States Census Bureau data dashboard.
- Utah Healthy Places Index, evidence-based and peer-reviewed tool, supports efforts to prioritize equitable community investments, develop critical programs and policies across the state, and much more.
- County Health Rankings
- Kaiser Family Foundation's State Health Facts
Medical literature can be queried at PubMed library.
Page Content Updated On 10/17/2024,
Published on 10/22/2024